Help-application for the competition "best in profession". Essay of the participant of the competition "The best in the profession" Characteristics of the participant the best in the profession

The grounds for applying a particular type of incentive for employees of an organization should be determined in the relevant local regulatory act. If this is not accepted in the organization, then when choosing one or another type of labor incentive, one can proceed from the established practice of regulating the procedures for encouraging employees, which is described by the author of the article.

When asked if your company uses non-monetary incentives, many HR directors answer positively, not without reason believing that public praise, awards and informing that someone is the best in a given period is nice. Among the legislatively defined measures of moral encouragement of employees, one can name the declaration of gratitude, the awarding of an honorary diploma, and the promotion to the title of the best in the profession. The moral rewards of employees for work not named by labor legislation can be established by employers independently, for example:

Public recognition of the merits of an employee at meetings held, including when summing up the results of the annual work of the organization;

Informing the entire staff of the organization about the achievements of the employee;

Referral of an employee to special conferences, seminars, exhibitions;

Providing opportunities for training, advanced training;

Creation of more comfortable working conditions for the employee;

Providing time off and extra days to leave;

Instructing an employee to perform special tasks as an expression of management's trust.

In addition to the above measures, a fairly strong moral incentive is the recognition of the merits of the employee directly by the management of the organization. For example, a manager can praise an employee for the work he successfully completed immediately after it is completed, discuss the results of his work with the employee, and evaluate the personal qualities of a conscientious employee.

Each employer needs to strive to ensure that the system of incentive measures applied to employees is not uniform, for this you need to use various forms and incentive methods.

Consider the features of the regulation of incentive measures and the practice of their application.

Thanks Announcement

The declaration of gratitude as a type of labor encouragement consists in the public expression by the employer of gratitude to the employee for such achievements in work as:

Improvement of indicators in comparison with previous periods, overfulfillment of the plan;

Successes in the early development and implementation of measures related to the improvement of the organization of production and labor, with an increase in the quality of products (work performed, services rendered);

Performing at a high level job duties;

Successful holding of events, implementation of projects, active participation in events or projects, etc.

The procedure for applying this incentive measure, as a rule, is regulated in a special local regulatory act (in the provision on the moral encouragement of an employee) or is established in a document more than general(in the regulation on the material and moral incentives for employees of the organization, the internal labor regulations, the regulation on staff incentives).

Sample Sample

Regulation on the moral encouragement of the employee

extraction

Section IV. Gratitude

For active participation in the implementation of particularly significant projects of the Company;

For flawless and efficient work in company;

For conscientious work and professional skills.

Gratitude is declared to the employees of the Company with the payment of a one-time incentive in the amount of the official salary.

2. An application for announcing Gratitude can be submitted by the heads of structural divisions of the Company.

3. When making proposals for announcing Gratitude, the heads of the Company's structural divisions shall submit the following documents:

Application for announcing Gratitude addressed to the head of the Company;

Characteristics of the encouraged in accordance with Appendix N 1 to this Regulation.

In the application for the announcement of Gratitude, information on the achievements of the employee to be awarded is indicated.

Award materials are submitted by the heads of structural divisions 2 months before the expected award to the HR department.

In the case of submission to the announcement of Gratitude for active participation in the implementation of particularly significant events, a petition and a list of persons who actively participated in the implementation of projects are submitted in the form in accordance with Appendix No. 2 to these Regulations.

4. The Human Resources Department considers the received award materials and prepares a draft order of the head of the Company on the announcement of Gratitude.

Award materials submitted in violation of the procedure established by these Regulations are returned with appropriate justifications to the applicant.

5. The draft order is agreed with the head structural unit of the company that filed the Acknowledgment request, the legal department, the department accounting and sent for signing to the head of the Company.

6. The announcement of Gratitude is carried out on the basis of the order of the head of the Company.

7. The announcement of Gratitude is carried out by the head of the Company or, on his behalf, by the first deputy head of the Company and the heads of the structural divisions of the Company in a solemn atmosphere.

8. Re-announcement of Gratitude for new merits is possible no earlier than two years after the previous award.

In exceptional cases, for high performance in the work, a repeated announcement of Gratitude is possible earlier than the specified date.

9. The description of the form and the sketch of Acknowledgments are given in appendices N N 3, 4 to this Regulation.

Although this is not directly provided for by the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, it is advisable to prepare an appropriate document with the heading "Gratitude" (Fig. 1 - not shown).

Rice. 1 - Gratitude Form

The figure is not shown.

Registration of "Gratitude" (entering information about the employee, ensuring the signature of the management and certification by the seal of the organization) is carried out by the personnel service of the organization.

Rewarding with the Certificate of Honor of the organization

A more significant measure of encouragement for success in work compared to gratitude is the awarding of an honorary diploma of the organization. It is usually awarded individual workers and teams, to which earlier for achievements in labor activity incentive was applied.

The awarding of an honorary diploma consists in the public presentation to the employee of a document indicating the recognition of the merits of the employee by the management of the organization. A local regulatory act of an organization may provide for a one-time bonus payment to an employee in connection with the award of a certificate of honor.

Among the grounds for awarding employees with certificates of honor are most often called:

High results in a specific area of ​​work;

professional skill;

Significant contribution to the development of the organization;

Innovation and other achievements in work;

Exemplary performance of work duties, etc.

Quite often, among the grounds for awarding employees with an honorary diploma are "long-term work in the organization" or "work experience in the organization for at least ___ years." fact itself long work in the organization is not a basis for encouragement in the sense that part 1 of Art. 191 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. At the same time, in the conditions of increasing competition, the loyalty of the staff can and should deserve an appropriate assessment by the employer.

In the presentation for the award of the certificate of honor, the following shall be indicated:

Surname, name, patronymic of the employee;

Date of his birth;

Position held;

Education;

Work experience;

Achievements (characteristic of the results of labor that deserve encouragement).

Sample Sample

Presentation For the award of the Honorary Diploma

Closed joint-stock company"Prior"

1. Surname, name, patronymic _________________________________________________

2. Year of birth ___________________________________________________________

3. Education (where, when he graduated from an educational institution)

4. Place of work, position held _____________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

5. Total work experience ____________________________________________________________

6. Work experience in this organization _______________________________________

7. Characteristics (specific merits) ____________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Head of the structural unit ___________________________________

(name of department,

signature, full name)

"__" ___________ 20__

It is advisable to set out the procedure for awarding employees with an organization's diploma of honor in a general local regulatory act on the promotion of employees or in a separate regulation on the organization's diploma of honor. First of all, it should officially establish the full name of this type of encouragement, which will be indicated in the order (instruction) on encouragement and recorded in the work book. Thus, the name of the organization's certificate of honor must contain the name of the organization, for example: "Certificate of Honor of the Closed Joint-Stock Company Prior" or "Certificate of Honor of Aprina LLC". This is necessary in order to distinguish it from other diplomas that an employee can be awarded.

Registration of a certificate of honor (acquisition of a ready-made form or ordering a printed form of an original design), entering information about the employee, ensuring the signature of the management and certifying with the seal of the organization are carried out by the personnel service of the organization.

Awarded the title of the best in the profession

The Labor Code of the Russian Federation provides for such a type of encouragement as a presentation for conferring the title of the best in the profession. As a type of intra-firm promotion, such a presentation provides for the formation of a competition commission, the formulation of the goals and objectives of organizing a competition, the development of conditions and indicators for the fulfillment of which such a title can be awarded to an employee, terms, frequency and procedure competition, timing and procedure for summing up.

The title of the best in the profession can be formulated according to one of the following schemes:

A) "best _______", for example:

"the best pastry chef";

"the best seller";

"the best doctor";

"the best driver";

B) "the best in the profession" _______ ", for example:

"the best "plasterer" by profession;

"the best by profession "machine milking master";

C) "best in profession among _______", for example:

"the best in profession among machine operators";

"the best in the profession among hairdressers."

Also, as a similar type of encouragement, the assignment of other significant titles, for example, "Excellence in Quality", "Best Young Worker", as well as honorary titles of organizations, for example, "Honored Worker of the Organization", "Master - Golden Hands", "Excellent Trade Worker", etc.

For this type of incentive to be "legitimate", it must be provided for in the collective agreement or internal labor regulations.

The award of the title of the best in the profession is carried out in two ways:

1) holding a special competition or review of professional skills among the employees of the organization and identifying the best of them. The objectives of such competitions or reviews are:

Developing a sense of prestige among employees of the profession;

Revival of the traditions of the profession;

Improving knowledge, skills and abilities in work;

Distribution and development of advanced techniques and methods of work, dissemination of the positive experience of the winners of the competition;

Disclosure of employees' creative potential;

Creation of incentives to improve professionalism in work;

Creation of a reserve of personnel from among the winners for replacement leadership positions, etc.

The commission (committee) created by the employer organizes the holding of the competition and, based on its results, determines the winner, who is awarded the title of the best in the profession;

2) generalization of the achievements of employees, carried out by the personnel service or other unit, and as a result of studying documents, conducting observations, surveys, etc., an employee with the best achievements.

As a rule, the title of the best in the profession is assigned to one winner. In confirmation of this, he is issued a certificate (diploma) of the title, as well as a ribbon with the appropriate inscription.

V last years Regional and municipal competitions and reviews of professional skills have become widespread, as a result of which the winners are awarded the title of the best in the profession within the city, district, region, etc. As a rule, they are initiated by local governments and executive authorities of the subjects Russian Federation. The direct holding of events, as a result of which the participants are awarded the title of the best in the profession in a certain nomination, is carried out by the organizing committees or commissions created by the indicated bodies.

Normative legal acts of the executive power of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and local governments provide that employees take part in such competitions or reviews on the proposal of the heads of organizations. When developing a document regulating the conditions and procedure for submission, the following sections should be provided (Table 1).

Table 1

Sections of the document regulating the competition

Awarded the title of "Best in Profession"

Awarding a valuable gift

An incentive in the form of rewarding with a valuable gift is a presentation to an employee of a specific thing that has a certain value.

With the entry of Russia into the era of market relations, symbolic gifts (busts of leaders, table sculptures, caskets, vases, handicrafts) were replaced by more practical items. household appliances and household items, tourist vouchers, etc. The value of a gift as a measure of encouragement is emphasized by appropriate engraving, a commemorative inscription, etc. The most prestigious is the manufacture of symbolic items on a special order of the organization.

When choosing a valuable gift, the personnel department should not only be guided by financial capabilities (the amount of funds allocated for the purchase of gifts), but also take into account the personality and wishes of the employee being encouraged.

Collective agreements, internal labor regulations, special local regulations that determine the procedure for encouraging an employee, may provide for the application of several (usually two) types of incentives to an employee at the same time. Thus, it is advisable to combine material types incentives with moral, for example, awarding a certificate of honor with a bonus, conferring the title of the best in the profession with a valuable gift, etc.

Pool of "corporate talent"

This type of local incentive, such as the inclusion of "corporate talent" in the pool, has a relatively small history in the practice of encouraging employees. Russian organizations. The main encouragement for those who got into the pool of "corporate talents" is intangible:

Priority in career advancement;

Great opportunities for development;

Participation in promising projects that "challenge" their capabilities;

Greater attention of status managers (it is possible to appoint a personal curator from among them).

Employees from among the "talents", of course, also have a material interest: they can increase their income much more often than others. "Corporate talent" can increase their income by receiving rewards for working on projects, encouragement for mentoring.

Entry on the Board of Honor, In the Gallery of Labor Glory, Book of Honor

Despite the fact that legislators did not transfer this type of encouragement from Art. 131 Labor Code of the Russian Federation in Art. 191 Labor Code RF, being placed on the honor roll is becoming more and more popular every year as a local promotion.

This type of encouragement consists in placing a photograph of an employee indicating the last name, first name, patronymic, position or profession on a specially made and installed stand - a board of honor (Fig. 2 - not shown).

Rice. 2 - Leaderboard

The figure is not shown.

The Board of Honor is established to spread the idea of ​​the positive attitude of the employer to the labor achievements of employees and demonstrates the manifestation of the employer's deep respect for the achievements of its employees. An organization may establish a common board of honor for the organization, and individual structural units (mainly production units) may have their own boards of honor.

Employees who have made the most significant contribution to the production and economic activity enterprises that have achieved stable high results, especially distinguished themselves in service and labor activities.

At present, electronic Honor Boards have become widespread, which are a virtual gallery of photographs of the best employees of the organization, posted on the corporate website of the organization. The order of entry on the electronic board of honor can be reflected in a special local act or in a general document (see an example document below).

Sample Sample

Regulations on the motivation of employees of LLC "Aprina"

extraction

1. General Provisions

1.2. Based on the results of work for the year, employees are awarded: for high achievements in increasing the efficiency and competitiveness of production, improving the quality of work performed and products, for fruitful production, scientific activities, who have worked in the company for at least one year.

1.3. The following list of awards and quotas for awarded employees has been established:

*Entering the best specialists on the electronic Board of Honor - 4 people.

2. Order of awarding

2.1. The award decision is made CEO companies. The head until December 1 determines the quotas for the divisions of the company.

2.2. Applications are submitted by the heads of departments before December 15 and are considered within one month. Managers who filed a petition for rewarding employees subordinate to them are personally responsible for the validity of the presentation for rewarding and the accuracy of the information contained in the petitions signed by them.

2.3. Presentation of valuable gifts and entry on the electronic board of honor is accompanied by Letters of Appreciation... which are signed by the General Director and certified with a seal.

3. Accounting and monetary support of incentives

3.2. When presenting Letters of Appreciation and Letters of Honor, when entering on the electronic Board of Honor, conferring the title "Best Aprin Worker", employees are given a cash reward in the amount of 10,000, 15,000 and 20,000 rubles, respectively.

In addition, it is desirable to define in the local regulatory act:

Requirements for a photo portrait of an employee (color / black and white, size, background, clothing);

The composition of the entry under each photo (usually - last name, first name, patronymic, position (profession, specialty), structural unit (if the honor roll belongs to the organization) and the procedure for its application (placement) on the honor roll);

The procedure for placing a photo portrait on the honor roll or opening it (in a solemn atmosphere, in the presence of an employee, etc.).

In order to avoid difficulties when registering this type of encouragement, even when establishing an honor roll, in the collective agreement or internal labor regulations, it is necessary to reflect the full name of the honor roll, i.e., including the name of the organization or structural unit of the organization. However, if the organization has only one common honors board, then in the order (instruction) on encouraging the employee, its name can be given without indicating the name of the organization.

In a number of organizations, the considered type of encouragement has been transformed into such an encouragement as entering a photograph of an employee in the gallery of labor glory, which is a combination of all the organization's honor stands into a single complex.

Employers who introduce this type of promotion for the first time need to remember that the honor roll is not infinite, and therefore it is necessary to determine the period during which the employee's photo will be placed on it. Most often, this period is 1 year (unless the honors board is intended to include the winners of regular labor competitions). After the expiration of the specified period, the employee’s photo must be taken, unless a decision is made in relation to the employee to re-encourage him in the form of entering on the honor roll.

Entry in the Book of Honor

Entry in the book of honor was previously provided for by Art. 131 Labor Code of the Russian Federation. Despite its absence in Art. 191 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, this type of incentive is increasingly included in the list of local incentives provided for by collective agreements or internal labor regulations.

The publication of the book of honor is a manifestation of deep respect for the merits of the employees of the organization. Such a book (Fig. 3 - not shown), as a rule, is an A3 format album, in which photographs of encouraged employees and sheets with the last name, first name and patronymic, position or profession of the employee, a brief curriculum vitae and description of merits are placed in special pockets , details of the order (instruction) on the promotion.

Rice. 3 - Covers of books of honor

Rice. not given.

The fact of entering into the book of honor is confirmed by the issuance of a certificate (Fig. 4 - not shown).

Rice. 4 - Samples of certificates of entry into the Book of Honor

Rice. not given.

The general basis for entering an employee into the book of honor is the achievement of high results in work, and additional conditions are a long work experience in the organization and the use of incentive measures of lesser significance in the past.

As with encouragement by entering on the honor roll (to avoid confusion in the order (instruction) on the application of this type of encouragement), it is advisable to indicate the name of the organization in the title of the honor book.

Determining in the local regulatory act of the organization the procedure for entering an employee in the book of honor, personnel services should establish the time the employee’s photo stays in the book, the requirements for the employee’s photo portrait, the procedure for making entries - by whom they are made, what content, whether the employee gets to know them, etc.

As a rule, color photo portraits of employees sized 9x12 (without a headdress, in festive clothes) are placed in the book of honor. The functions of making an entry in the book are entrusted to one of the employees personnel service(usually the head of human resources).

The book of honor must be kept in a room intended for holding ceremonial events (an assembly hall, a conference hall, a representative office), in the museum of the organization or in another room that allows everyone to get acquainted with it.

In a number of organizations, the analogues of the book of honor are the book of labor glory, the book of the history of the organization.

Corporate awards

The current legislation does not establish a ban on the establishment of an organization's own corporate badge and medal, so the awarding of a corporate award or badge is increasingly appearing in collective agreements and internal labor regulations as a form of moral encouragement for staff.

The corporate badge should have a special title. In order for it to be "legitimate", the leadership of the organization must make sure that the badge being established does not duplicate departmental and, even more so, state badges. According to the Regulations on State Awards of the Russian Federation, the illegal establishment and production of signs that have similar, similar names or external resemblance to state awards are prohibited.

To avoid complications, it is desirable that the names of corporate badges contain the name of the organization and are associated with some significant event, such as the anniversary of the organization, etc.

In confirmation of the fact of awarding a badge, as well as the right to wear it, an employee, as a rule, is issued an appropriate certificate or certificate.

For a badge or a corporate medal, it is necessary to develop not only the official name, but also approve the full description appearance awards, as well as fix in the internal document the conditions, procedure and procedure for making a decision on awarding and the procedure for presenting awards to employees (see an example below).

Sample Sample

Description of the badge "The best worker of Aprina LLC"

The badge is a blue oval with a golden edging in the form of laurel branches.

In the center of the oval is the logo of "Aprina" LLC. Under the logo - in a golden figured shield with a border - an inscription in straight letters: the best employee of Aprina LLC.

Sign height - 50 mm, width - 30 mm.

On the reverse side badge device for attaching to clothing and its serial number.

Regulations on the badge "The best worker of Aprina LLC"

1. The badge "The best employee of Aprina LLC" (hereinafter referred to as the badge) is established to reward employees of Aprina LLC (hereinafter referred to as the Company) for performing tasks of particular importance and complexity, successful and conscientious performance of their official duties, impeccable, at least five years, work and other achievements in work.

2. The badge can be awarded to the heads of departments for their great contribution to the development of financial and executive discipline, the system of financial and economic control.

3. The issue of awarding a badge is considered at the award commission on the proposal of the heads of the Company's structural divisions and the head of the Company. The submission reflects information about the professional activities of persons nominated for awarding a badge, their personal contribution to ensuring the Company's activities.

4. The decision to award a badge is made by the award commission by a majority vote of the total number of members of the commission.

5. The presentation of the badge and certificate to it is carried out in a solemn atmosphere by the head of the Company or, on his behalf, by the deputy head of the Company.

6. The awarded badge is awarded a sum of money in the amount of three times the monthly salary.

7. The badge is worn on the right side of the chest and is located below the state awards.

8. In the work book of the awarded, an entry is made about the awarding of the badge.

9. The person awarded with a badge has the right to establish the maximum salary for the position, the preferential right to receive annual leave and tourist vouchers at a convenient time for him.

10. Registration of documents on awarding a badge and accounting of the awarded is provided by the personnel department of the Company.

Thus, the introduction of measures of moral encouragement should be accompanied by the approval of the procedure for their registration and individual accounting. In particular, the issue of their reflection in the work books of employees should be resolved. Since the work book is intended to record individual labor activity, it should contain information about the employee's encouragement for his individual merits, and not about the recognition of the labor achievements of the labor collective (structural unit) of which he is a member.

And other measures

Often, in local incentive systems, the early removal of a previously imposed disciplinary sanction is indicated as an incentive measure. Without denying the stimulating nature of this measure, nevertheless, experts recommend not designating it as a type of encouragement. Moreover, its application is formalized not by an order (instruction) on encouragement, but by a separate order (instruction) on the early removal of a disciplinary sanction. The removal of a disciplinary sanction should not be considered as an incentive measure applied to employees in the manner prescribed by Art. 194 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, since this is the restoration of the position of the employee that existed before the application of disciplinary measures against him. As a general rule, a disciplinary sanction is removed when the employer can see that it has played its educational role and the employee has corrected his behavior by exemplary performance of work duties.

If the entity still applies the withdrawal disciplinary action as a measure to encourage employees, then in the local regulatory act that determines the procedure for encouraging, it is necessary to separately stipulate that information about its application is not entered in the employee's work book in the section on incentives.

According to part 2 of Art. 191 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, incentives for employees can be determined by charters and regulations on discipline. In this case, charters and regulations are understood to mean non-local regulations organizations, but normative legal acts approved by the Government of the Russian Federation in accordance with federal laws, charters and regulations on discipline for certain categories of employees. These include, for example, the Regulations on the discipline of railway workers, approved. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of August 25, 1992 N 621 (as amended on July 14, 2001, as amended on July 14, 2003); Disciplinary charter of paramilitary mine rescue units in transport construction, approved. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of July 30, 1994 N 879; Charter on the discipline of employees of organizations with especially dangerous production in the field of the use of atomic energy, approved. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of July 10, 1998 N 744 and a number of others.

Such documents provide for the use of most of the above types of incentives. However, a significant part of them are departmental awards.

Thus, according to the Regulations on the discipline of railway workers, railway workers are awarded the badge "Honorary Railwayman". In accordance with the Disciplinary Charter customs service Russian Federation customs officers are awarded departmental badges "Honorary customs officer of Russia" and "Excellent worker of the customs service". The awarding of the badges "Honorary worker of the navy" and "Honorary polar explorer" is provided for by the Charter on the discipline of the crews of the support ships of the Navy for crew members of the support ships of the Navy.

Among the additional measures not discussed above, one can name the early assignment of the next special rank, which is applied on public service, as well as the assignment of the next special rank one step higher than the corresponding position. Awarding personalized weapons is predominantly common in the state law enforcement service. In some industries, the use of such an incentive measure as an increase in the duration of annual leave is practiced. For example, an increase in the duration of annual leave for up to 5 days is provided for by the Disciplinary Charter of militarized mine rescue units in transport construction.

From practice

Andrey Tsinchenko, Head of the Human Resources Department at Khlebny Dom, said in an interview:

In celebration of the company's 70th anniversary, we have established two awards. The first is the most significant, something like our own Order "For Labor and Loyalty". This is a badge made of precious metals (silver with gilding) for ceremonial wear and its reduced copy - a silver badge that can be worn on everyday clothes every day.

Unfortunately, the sanitary norms adopted by us are to wear it on work clothes do not allow. Of our entire team of two thousand, no more than three or four people can be nominated for this award every five years. In addition, the requirements for work experience and its quality are quite serious, i.e., the employee must be a truly flawless worker. Attention is drawn to his achievements and personal qualities. In addition to the badge, a bonus is provided, which can amount to a very serious amount equal to the employee's salary for six months.

The second award established by us may be more accessible, but no less important - "Master of Golden Hands". The sign is also made of precious metals. It is awarded to those who have shown high achievements in their professional activities, who are valuable to the company as an excellent specialist. There may already be more than 20 people presented for this award. We award every three years, and, of course, the presentation of the award is accompanied by a prize.

Naturally, we also have the title of "Best in Profession", photographs of such employees are placed on the factory board of honor.

There are also competitions between labor collectives for the best performance, and, of course, we present honored workers for state awards.

• HR records management

Keywords:

1 -1

Protocol No. ___

on the nomination of the nominee for the federal stage All-Russian competition

professional excellence "Best in profession"

"___" ___________20___

Presided over:

(full name, position)

Present:

members of the regional competition commission:

(full name, position)

(full name, position)

_______________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

_______________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

secretary of the regional competition commission:

_______________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

1. Consideration of the results of the performance of competitive tasks
and nomination of candidates for participation in the federal stage "Best in Profession" in the nomination " The best beekeeper» was held in _____________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

(indicate the venue of the regional stage of the competition)

(the results of the competitive selection for candidates who took 1-3 places are given)

2. The regional competition commission reviewed the results of the competition tasks and made the following decision:

According to the results of the competition tasks

(Full name of the employee, name of the organization)

recognized as the winner in the nomination "Best beekeeper" at the regional stage and nominated for participation in the federal stage of the All-Russian competition of professional skills "Best in profession" in the nomination "Best beekeeper" from ________________________________________________________.

(name of the subject of the Russian Federation)

Appendix

All-Russian competition of professional skills

"Best in profession" in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

__________________________________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT

for participation in the federal stage of the All-Russian competition of professional skills "Best in profession" in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

Organization*

_____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

(Name legal entity)

declares participation __________________________________________________________

(Full name of the participant of the competition)

in the federal stage of the All-Russian competition "The Best in Profession", held in 2017, in the nomination "The Best Beekeeper".

I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of the competition.

The following documents are attached to the application:

Copy of the participant's passport;

Protocol on the nomination of a nominee for the federal stage of the Contest in the form application number 1 to this Regulation with an accompanying letter authorized body Governments of the region;

Personal record of the personnel of the participant of the federal stage of the Contest, indicating his passport data and contact phone number;

A copy of the certificate of the general experience of work as a beekeeper (extract from work book or a certificate from the local self-government bodies of the rural settlement at the place of residence);

Color or black-and-white photo 4x6 cm of the participant of the federal stage of the Contest;

A copy of the certificate of primary, secondary vocational education or a copy of the certificate of general education participant of the federal stage of the Competition, if available - a copy of the diploma of higher education;

Copies of diplomas, certificates, certificates
on advanced training, retraining (if any) of a participant in the federal stage of the Contest;

Brief information about the main results of the activities of the organization in which the contestant works for the last two years as a beekeeper;

Information about the introduction by the participant of the federal stage of the Contest or with his direct participation of advanced technologies (if any, indicate which ones), copies rationalization proposals(in the presence of);

Photo and video materials describing the work of the contestant, including on electronic media (if these materials are available);

Characteristics for the participant of the federal stage of the Competition, reflecting the main results of professional activity, training, indicating the specific merits of the contestant and professional achievements, availability of awards, diplomas (name, date of delivery), work experience in a competitive profession, qualifications, participation in competitions;

A notarized copy of an extract from a single state register legal entities or a certificate from the administration of the rural settlement at the place of residence of the contestant;

Information about the persons accompanying the participant of the competition (contact numbers, passport details).

We guarantee the completeness and accuracy of the information specified in this application and the documents attached to it.

Details of the applicant (organization (branch):

_____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

(the actual address)

registered (created - for branches) "" _________________ 20__

_____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

(the body that registered the legal entity - the applicant)

"____" _______________2017

* The applicant (head of the organization) may be a local self-government body of a rural settlement at the place of residence of the participant in the competition, if the participant in the federal stage of the Competition is a beekeeper of a personal subsidiary farm.

Appendix

All-Russian competition of professional skills

"Best in profession" in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

PROTOCOL No. ___
opening envelopes with materials for participation in the federal stage of the All-Russian competition of professional skills

"___" _________ 2017

1. At a meeting of the Expert Working Group to review the materials of the participants of the All-Russian competition of professional skills "The best
by profession" in the nomination "Best beekeeper" at the federal stage (hereinafter referred to as the expert group, competition) was attended by:

Chairman of the expert group:

_______________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

Members of the expert group:

_______________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

_______________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

_______________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

2. The procedure for opening envelopes and considering materials for participation in the competition was carried out on "____" __________2017 in _____________________

_____________________________________________________________________

(indicate the location of the procedure)

Start of procedure __ hours __ minutes (local time).

3. As of "___" ____________ 2017 for the procedure
autopsy was submitted ____ (________________) sealed envelopes

(number in words)

with materials for participation in the competition at the federal stage.

4. Prior to the opening of envelopes with materials for participation in the competition, not a single application was withdrawn / ___ (_______________) applications were withdrawn.

(number in words)

5. The opening of envelopes with materials for participation in the competition was carried out by the secretary of the expert group in accordance with the register of envelopes with materials for participation in the competition with the announcement of the following information in relation to each envelope with materials:

Surname, name, patronymic of the participant of the competition;

Name of the organization (for a legal entity), educational institution who submitted materials to the participants of the competition;

Competition nomination;

Availability of information and documents provided by the documentation
about the competition.

6. The expert group, in accordance with the requirements and conditions established in the tender documentation, decided:

6.1. Allow the following participants to participate in the competition at the federal stage:

6.2. Reject applications for participation in the competition at the federal stage of the following participants in the competition:

Appendix

to the Regulations on holding the Moscow regional stage

All-Russian competition of professional skills

"Best in profession" in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

STATEMENT

results of the theoretical task

in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

Chairman of the Expert

(signature) (full name)

Members of the Expert

working group

(signature) (full name)

________________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

________________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

Appendix

to the Regulations on holding the Moscow regional stage

All-Russian competition of professional skills

"Best in profession" in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

STATEMENT

results of the implementation of practical task No. 1

participants of the Moscow regional stage of the All-Russian competition of professional skills "The Best in Profession"

in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

Chairman of the Expert

working group _______________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

Members of the Expert

(signature) (full name)

________________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

________________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

Appendix

to the Regulations on holding the Moscow regional stage

All-Russian competition of professional skills

"Best in profession" in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

STATEMENT

results of the implementation of practical task No. 2

participants of the Moscow regional stage of the All-Russian competition of professional skills "The Best in Profession"

in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

Chairman of the Expert

working group _______________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

Members of the Expert

working group ________________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

________________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

________________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

Appendix

to the Regulations on holding the Moscow regional stage

All-Russian competition of professional skills

"Best in profession" in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

STATEMENT

the results of the implementation of practical task No. 3

participants of the Moscow regional stage of the All-Russian competition of professional skills "The Best in Profession"

in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

Chairman of the Expert

working group _______________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

Members of the Expert

working group ________________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

________________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

________________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

Appendix

to the Regulations on holding the Moscow regional stage

All-Russian competition of professional skills

"Best in profession" in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

STATEMENT

results of the implementation of practical task No. 4

participants of the Moscow regional stage of the All-Russian competition of professional skills "The Best in Profession"

in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

Chairman of the Expert

working group _______________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

Members of the Expert

working group ________________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

________________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

________________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

Appendix

to the Regulations on holding the Moscow regional stage

All-Russian competition of professional skills

"Best in profession" in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

SUMMARY

participants of the Moscow regional stage of the All-Russian competition of professional skills "Best in Profession" in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

Chairman of the Expert

working group _______________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

Members of the Expert

working group ________________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

________________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

________________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

Appendix

to the Regulations on holding the Moscow regional stage

All-Russian competition of professional skills

"Best in profession" in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

SUMMARY

(estimated) statement of the results of the performance of competitive tasks (theoretical and practical)

participants of the Moscow regional stage of the All-Russian competition of professional skills

"Best in profession" in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

Appendix

to the Regulations on holding the Moscow regional stage

All-Russian competition of professional skills

"Best in profession" in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

MINUTES #____

consideration of the results of the performance of competitive tasks by participants

Moscow regional stage of the All-Russian competition of professional skills "Best in profession" in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

"___" _______ 2017

1. At the meeting of the Expert Working Group to consider the results of the performance of competitive tasks by the participants of the All-Russian competition of professional skills "The Best in Profession" in the nomination "The Best Beekeeper" at the federal stage were present:

Chairman of the Expert Working Group

_______________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

Members of the Expert Working Group:

_______________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

_______________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

_______________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

2. The procedure for reviewing the results of the performance of competitive tasks was carried out on "___" ___________2017 in _____________________________________.

(specify venue)

3. For the procedure for reviewing the results of the performance of competitive tasks, a list of participants in the competition from _________________________________

(number in words)

nominees who completed the competitive tasks and included in the summary evaluation sheet.

4. The expert working group reviewed the results of the competition tasks in accordance with the approved criteria and made the following decision on the winners and prize-winners of the competition in the nomination "Best beekeeper":

5. On the basis of this protocol, the Expert Working Group will prepare a draft decision on contenders for prizes in the specified nomination for consideration in.

Appendix

Regulations on holding the Moscow regional stage

All-Russian competition of professional skills

"Best in profession" in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

PROTOCOL №___

on the results of the Moscow regional stage of the All-Russian competition of professional skills "The Best in Profession"

in the nomination "Best beekeeper"

"___" _______ 2017

1. At the meeting of the Moscow Regional Competition Commission to consider the results of the federal stage of the All-Russian competition of professional skills "The Best in Profession" were present:

Chairman

Moscow Regional Competition Commission

_________________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

Members of the Moscow Regional

competition commission:

_________________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

_________________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

_________________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

_________________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

2. The procedure for reviewing the results of the Moscow regional stage of the All-Russian competition of professional skills "Best in Profession" was carried out on "___" ___________2017 in ___________________________________.

(specify venue)

3. To consider the results of the Moscow regional stage of the All-Russian competition of professional skills "Best in Profession", the minutes and the decision of the Expert Working Group in the nomination "Best Beekeeper" on the consideration of the results of the performance of competitive tasks in this nomination, a summary evaluation sheet of the results of the performance of competitive tasks with a list of contenders for prizes.

4. The Moscow Regional Competition Commission reviewed the results of the Moscow Regional Stage of the All-Russian Competition of Professional Skills "Best in Profession" and made the following decision on the winner and prize-winners of the competition in the nomination "Best Beekeeper"

Chairman

Moscow Regional Competition Commission

______________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

Members of the Moscow Regional

competition commission:

______________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

______________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

______________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

______________________________________________________________________

(full name, position)

Appendix No. 2

CHARACTERISTIC in the nomination " Best Operator machine milking cows (on linear milking machines) of the year"

Continuation of Appendix No. 2 CHARACTERISTIC performance indicators of the participant of the regional competition for the title "Best in Profession 20___" in the nomination "Best fattening operator cattle of the year" Full name and profession (specialty) of the candidate _________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ Name or name of the employer of the candidate and the district (city) at the location or residence _______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ Table 1

Continuation of Appendix No. 2 CHARACTERISTIC performance indicators of the participant of the regional competition for the title "Best in Profession 20___" in the nomination "Best pig fattening operator of the year" Full name and profession (specialty) of the candidate _________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ Name or name of the employer of the candidate and the district (city) at the location or residence _______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ Table 1

Continuation of Appendix No. 2 CHARACTERISTIC performance indicators of the participant of the regional competition for the title "Best in Profession 20___" in the nomination "Best Poultry Operator for Service" industrial herd of laying hens of the year" Full name and profession (specialty) of the candidate _________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ Name or name of the employer of the candidate and the district (city) at the location or residence _______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ Table 1

Continuation of Appendix No. 2 CHARACTERISTIC performance indicators of the participant of the regional competition for the title "Best in Profession 20___" agricultural production of the year" Full name and profession (specialty) of the candidate _________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ Name or name of the employer of the candidate and the district (city) at the location or residence _______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ Table 1

Continuation of Appendix No. 2 CHARACTERISTIC performance indicators of the participant of the regional competition for the title "Best in Profession 20___" in the nomination "Best Tractor Driver" self-propelled agricultural machines (combine combine harvester) of the year" Full name and profession (specialty) of the candidate _________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ Name or name of the employer of the candidate and the district (city) at the location or residence _______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ Table 1

Continuation of Appendix No. 2 CHARACTERISTIC performance indicators of the participant of the regional competition for the title "Best in Profession 20___" in the nomination "Best Driver" truck of the year"

Continuation of Appendix No. 2 CHARACTERISTIC performance indicators of the participant of the regional competition for the title "Best in Profession 20___" in the nomination " Best leader agricultural organization of the year" Full name and profession (specialty) of the candidate _________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ Name or name of the employer of the candidate and the district (city) at the location or residence _______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ Table 1

Continuation of Appendix No. 2 CHARACTERISTIC performance indicators of the participant of the regional competition for the title "Best in Profession 20___" in the nomination "Best Agronomist of the Year" Full name and profession (specialty) of the candidate _________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ Name or name of the employer of the candidate and the district (city) at the location or residence _______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ Table 1

Continuation of Appendix No. 2 CHARACTERISTIC performance indicators of the participant of the regional competition for the title "Best in Profession 20___" in the nomination "Best livestock specialist of the year" Full name and profession (specialty) of the candidate _________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ Name or name of the employer of the candidate and the district (city) at the location or residence _______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ Table 1

Continuation of Appendix No. 2 CHARACTERISTIC performance indicators of the participant of the regional competition for the title "Best in Profession 20___" in the nomination "Best Engineer of the Year" Full name and profession (specialty) of the candidate _________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ Name or name of the employer of the candidate and the district (city) at the location or residence _______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ Table 1

Continuation of Appendix No. 2 CHARACTERISTIC performance indicators of the participant of the regional competition for the title "Best in Profession 20___" in the nomination "Best Veterinarian of the Year" Full name and profession (specialty) of the candidate _________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________

At the Kalashnikov Electric Bulb Plant, a competition of professional skills "The Best in Profession" was held. The competition, which was held for the first time, was held in two stages: theoretical and practical.

The competition was attended by workers of the assembly lines of the enterprise's workshops in the following categories:

– Stacker-packer;

– Controller of parts and devices;

– Solderer (soldering);

- sokolevschik;

- Installer of electrovacuum devices.

The value of this competition cannot be overestimated, because it is an important element corporate culture. In addition, it is designed to raise the prestige of working specialties.

Competitions for the title of "Best in Profession" also help in solving other important tasks facing the enterprise: increasing production efficiency, labor productivity, strengthening professional skills and developing the creative initiative of employees. And for the participants themselves, the competition is a great way to improve their personal skill level.

In the first competition "Best in Profession" 5 employees in each category took part.

Mastery in each direction was evaluated by highly qualified specialists who are members of the jury. These are QCD employees and assembly shop specialists. The competitive commission was headed by Lepshova N.M., deputy director for production.

The contestants showed professional knowledge, enthusiasm and optimism. The company is rightly proud of its experienced and cohesive labor collective, consisting of highly qualified, highly professional employees capable of performing the most complex and responsible tasks, including in extreme situations.

According to the results of all tests, the winners were:

1. Baranova Natalya Anatolyevna - stacker-packer.

2. Elena Vyacheslavovna Listopadova – assembler of electrovacuum devices.

3. Gromova Nadezhda Nikolaevna - inspector of parts and devices.

4. Kopyttsina Irina Valerievna – sokoler (soldering).

5. Grigoryeva Irina Viktorovna - socle maker.

At the solemn meeting following the results of the competition, all participants were awarded diplomas, and the winners were awarded a cash prize.

The “Best in Profession” competition is not only a confirmation of professionalism and skill, but also a good financial incentive for employees.

Lepshova Nina Mikhailovna, Deputy Director for Production, Chairman of the Competition Commission:

The atmosphere of the competition was friendly. They took part in the competition with the desire to win. All participants worked very hard.

As other members of the commission noted, the competition is a necessary and useful undertaking, the presence of spectators and fans will make the competition more interesting. Many contestants were pleasantly surprised, they opened up from a new side. The well-coordinated work of Loginova A.G. , stacker - packer. At the height were the employees of the technical control department.

Gromova Nadezha Nikolaevna, inspector of parts and instruments:

She behaved calmly, and this helped to win. It was a pleasure to participate in the competition. We all have been working for a long time, for me it was a common working situation. I was a little twitchy on the theory, but everything went fine. I believe that such competitions are needed at our enterprise, but only for calm people, and not for impressionable ones. I also think that such competitions should be held honestly and fairly. And I wish the future participants peace, only peace. Perhaps in the future I will still participate in such competitions, if invited.

Listopadova Elena Vyacheslavovna, installer of electrovacuum devices:

- The impressions are positive, it seemed very interesting, it was so exciting, but in general, everything went fine. Probably, knowledge of technology, production, experience and the fact that I have been working for a long time helped to win. The hardest part of the competition was the excitement! It was difficult to deal with him. I believe that such competitions are needed at our enterprise, especially for young girls. Despite the fact that I won and received a cash prize, I think that in the future I will not participate in such competitions anymore. It is very difficult to deal with anxiety. It's time to give way to the young, so I wish future participants to delve deeper into production, to know everything, to be interested.

Grigoryeva Irina Viktorovna, socle builder:

Everything went well, the questions on the theory were also normal. Knowledge and the fact that we have been working for a long time helped to take the first place. It was difficult when they clattered first on a small lamp, then on a large one. It was hard to readjust right away. I believe that such competitions at our enterprise are necessary for young people to study. In the future, perhaps, I will take part in the competition again, but everything will depend on the situation and mood. I wish future participants success and to learn more and delve into production.

Kopyttsina Irina Valerievna, socle maker (soldering):

When the competition was first announced, we were worried about everything, because it was the first time it was held. Nobody wanted to at first. We were worried that we had a large lamp in our workshop, and the practical stage was carried out on a small lamp. It was difficult, but we tried. I think that calmness and slowness led me to victory. I did everything as I usually do on the line. At first there was excitement, but when they sat down at their workplaces, everything became normal. The fact that the competition was not held at the usual workplace created certain difficulties. I had to select a line, fire, soldering, adjust everything for myself. No wonder they say that houses and walls help. I think that competitions at the enterprise need both such and others and more often, for example, a competition for women in needlework. I do not plan to participate in such a competition again, we have many other professions, they also need to compete. And I wish future participants not to worry, there is nothing to worry about. You just need to work as usual and try a little. I would like to tell the organizers that the competition should be held in their workshop, because we have a completely different lamp. Although for me it was not very important, since I have experience with a small lamp, but the other participants did not work with a small lamp at all, it was difficult for them. It is important that before the competition they give a try, try on, and not immediately start soldering.

Baranova Natalya Anatolyevna, stacker - packer:

Everything was good, the main thing in victory is experience. I was a little worried that there were a lot of spectators around, and everyone was looking at me during the competition. But, in principle, nothing complicated. I think that such a competition can also be held for adjusters. I wish success to future participants and that they try to work. The only wish for the organizers is to hold the competition at the usual workplaces, for example, we have a slower speed on a large lamp, so it’s hard to adapt right away.

Svetlana KOROVASHKINA, KELZ HR Manager

Reference submission for the applicant MBOU "Ivanovskaya secondary school" for the award of the title "Best in profession in 2016" in the nomination "The best teacher of chemistry" 1. Nomination 2. Surname of the applicant 3. Name of the applicant 4. Patronymic of the applicant 5. Place of work, position 6. Gender 7. Date of birth (day, month, year) 8. Place of birth 9. Education (full name of the educational organization, year of graduation) 10. Qualification category (date of its assignment), academic degree, academic title 11. What state and departmental ( industry) awards, awards of the Moscow region, Stupinsky municipal district municipal and departmental awarded, date of award (for all teaching activities) 12. Work experience: general / in the industry 13. Work experience in this organization The best teacher of chemistry Popova Valentina Mikhailovna MBOU "Ivanovskaya secondary school" Chemistry teacher Female January 22, 1961 Tambov region, Bondarsky district, p. Arable Corner. Higher, Tambov State Pedagogical Institute, 1983 First qualification category, 11.11. 2015 (Order No. 5957 of the Ministry of Defense of the Moscow Region of November 16, 2015. 1. Diploma of the Ministry of Education of the Moscow Region (Order No. 275k of the Ministry of Defense of the Moscow Region of September 7, 2005) 2. Diploma "Teacher of the Digital Age" from the School of Digital century Moscow, 2015 3. Diploma of the Department of Education of the Stupinsky District, 2006 4. Diploma of the Administration of the Stupinsky District, 2007 5. Diploma of the Administration of the Stupinsky Municipal District, 2009 ", 2011. 7. Thank You Letter Heads of the Stupino municipal district, 2015 14. Characteristics for the applicant (the characteristics should reflect the specific merits, achievements of the candidate for 2014-2016) 1. Productivity educational activities teacher: dynamics of educational results of students (pupils) (indicate in % by years) Year 2014 2015 2016 Quality of knowledge 56% 72.3% 73.2% Level of education 100% 100% 100% 2. Productivity of the teacher in the development of students ( pupils): 2.1. Number of participants/winners/winners of the municipal stage of the Higher School of Education (by years) Years 2014 2015 2016 Total number 3 3 2 Winners 1 1 2.2. The number of participants / prize-winners / winners of the regional stage of the High School of Education (by years) is not. 2.3. The results of students (pupils) in other Olympiads, competitions in accordance with the Lists approved by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation and the Ministry of Defense of the Ministry of Defense (by years, indicating the name of the competition and the result of participation) School level Intellectual game "Chemistry and Life" Winners 5 Reference MKOU "Ivanovskaya secondary school" from 22.06.2015 Extra-curricular event in chemistry "Intellectual ring" Winners1, prize-winners2 Certificate of MKOU "Ivanovskaya secondary school" dated 06/22/2015 Chemistry game "Intellectual Express" Winners 2 Certificate of MKOU "Ivanovskaya secondary school" dated 06/22/2015 Extra-curricular event in chemistry "A nuka, catch up! » Winners 1 Certificate MKOU "Ivanovskaya secondary school" dated 06/22/2015 Municipal level Intellectual game "Knowledge Box" Certificate MBOU DPO IMC dated 24.06. 2014 Intellectual game "Chemistry in puzzles" 2016, Minutes No. 1 15. Consent to the processing of personal data from the applicant received 16. Candidacy recommended (name of the body that made the decision, date of discussion, protocol number) We confirm the accuracy of the information specified in the Certificate of submission. Deputy Director for Water Resources _____________ I.V. Chaley Head of the School of Natural History and Mathematics ____________ V.M. Popova Head of the School of Humanitarian Studies, Chairman trade union committee _____________ N.A. Kirillova Head of ShMO primary school. ______________ E.V. Ivanova Director of MBOU "Ivanovskaya secondary school" ___________________ E.V. Paskar MP "_______" __________________ 2017